yick wo造句

• Yick Wo's laundry had never failed an inspection for fire safety.
• But Yick Wo Elementary School in San Francisco made the best of Thursday's blackout.
• However, in Yick Wo and Gomillion, the court accepted an extremely disproportionate impact as evidence proving a discriminatory intent.
• Susie Siegel, a kindergarten teacher at Yick Wo School, kept running into stopped traffic to hand out leaflets to drivers.
• Margold concluded " such laws administering such a system were denying equal protection of law under the " Yick Wo v . Hopkins " ruling of 1886 and therefore were unconstitutional.
• Yick Wo ( 蕍孴, Pinyin : " Y?H?", Cantonese Yale : Yik1 Wo6, Americanization : Lee Yick ), was a laundry facility owned by Sang Lee.
• The plaintiffs relied on Yick Wo and Gomillion v . Lightfoot, in which plaintiffs succeeded in challenging laws that were written in racially neutral terms, but that severely detrimented one racial group.
• In the absence of a pattern as stark as those in Yick Wo or Gomillion, " impact alone is not determinative, and the Court must look to other evidence " of racebased decisionmaking.
• Matthews served for eight years until his death in 1889 . His opinion in " Yick Wo v . Hopkins " in 1886 advanced his and Hayes'views on the protection of ethnic minorities'rights.
• "Yick Wo " is cited in " Hirabayashi v . United States " ( 320 US 81, 1943 ) to recognize that : " Distinctions between citizens solely based because of their ancestry are by their very nature odious to a free people whose institutions are founded upon the doctrine of equality.
• This period, however, also saw the " Yick Wo v . Hopkins " case in 1886, which was the first case where the United States Supreme Court ruled that a law that was race-neutral on its face that was administered in a prejudicial manner was an infringement of the Equal Protection Clause.
• In 1886, the Supreme Court struck down a Californian law, in " Yick Wo v . Hopkins ", judging that although it was race-neutral on its face, it was administered in a prejudicial manner was an infringement of the Equal Protection Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment to the U . S . Constitution.
• Since the California gold rush, many Chinese migrants made their living as domestic servants, housekeepers, running restaurants, laundries ( leading to the 1886 Supreme Court decision Yick Wo v . Hopkins and then to the 1933 creation of the Chinese Hand Laundry Alliance ) and a wide spectrum of shops, such as food stores, antique shops, jewelers, and imported goods stores.
• In " Yick Wo v . Hopkins " ( 1886 ), the Supreme Court has clarified that the meaning of " person " and " within its jurisdiction " in the Equal Protection Clause would not be limited to discrimination against African Americans, but would extend to other races, colors, and nationalities such as ( in this case ) legal aliens in the United States who are Chinese citizens:
• As early as Yick Wo v . Hopkins, 118 U . S . 356 ( 1886 ), the Court recognized that a laundry permit ordinance was administered in a deliberate way to exclude all Chinese from the laundry business; and in Gomillion v . Lightfoot, 364 U . S . 339 ( 1960 ), the Court concluded that the redrawing of Tuskegee, Alabama's municipal boundaries left no doubt that the plan was designed to exclude blacks.
• In the decades following the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Supreme Court overturned laws barring blacks from juries ( " Strauder v . West Virginia ", 1880 ) or discriminating against Chinese Americans in the regulation of laundry businesses ( " Yick Wo v . Hopkins ", 1886 ), the Supreme Court held that the states could impose segregation so long as they provided similar facilities the formation of the " separate but equal " doctrine.
• In " Pace v . Alabama " ( 1883 ), the Court upheld an adultery prohibition that punished inter-racial fornication more than same-race fornication . " Pace " was overruled by " McLaughlin v . Florida " ( 1964 ) . " Yick Wo v . Hopkins " ( 1886 ) struck down a discretionary laundry permitting system that disadvantaged Asians . " Hayes v . Missouri " ( 1887 ) rejected an equal protection challenge to a statute authorizing the prosecution more peremptory challenges in large cities.